Photons:
What Is A Photon? ...The sensible answer
DraftScience vs Michel van Biezen ..Double Slit Deception
DraftPhysics vs The Action Lab ...Squishing Light and Heisenberg
Single slit facts
1. The single slit math models two vectors with Point sources at the surfaces. -- That is, the math models two diffracting "waves" with their centers at the surfaces.
2. The math predicts/models a result on a curved surface of radius L (target distance).
3. The number of possible nodes/locations of constructive or destructive interference is defined by how many wavelengths of the light fit in the distance between the surfaces. ... Dividing the wavelength into the distance between the surfaces will tell you exactly how many on/off nodes will be projected onto the curved surface.
4. The "path length difference" at 90° is the total distance between the surfaces and dictates what the node at 0° will be.
5. The equidistant vectors pointing to the center do not create real nodes as they only span a tiny distance (the distance between two surfaces) at the Target. Real vectors move in the same left/right direction.
7. The double slit experiment is just two single slit experiment superimposed on top of each other. Not to single slits of the same dimensions, but rather a composite product of a single slit with the dimensions of the center impediment and a single slit with the dimensions of the outside surfaces. ... The double slit is combining two, two Source, experiments... Where the four sources are in phase there is construction of a photon... When all four sources are not in phase no photon is recorded.
About: The other Dissidents
Ken wheeler
Big and colorful.... But not in any good ways... Pretty much just a big fat green ink failed liar. Apparently he got fat filling up on himself.... Monstrous ego, humongous arrogance, gigantic exaggerations, overflowing verbiage. Claims to be the only expert on magnetism... yet thinks light can be bent by magnets. Regurgitates a lot of Tesla rubbish into a propaganda pie topped with crap like free energy. Never have so many good words been so horribly wasted.
Miles Mathis
With a paintbrush he's pretty good at rendering reality... With a pen he can just write exaggerations and distortions. Add in some anti-semitism and it just becomes an unfunny joke... Just an example of how a little knowledge can become a dangerous thing. His physics focuses on something called a charge field but he doesn't explain what the field is made of. In brief, he just offers well-written garbage.
ThunderboltsProject
Just a New Age religion... Just a human-centric perversion of history, mechanism, and purpose. Overtly tries to make physical facts conform to historical Fables. Basically thinks electricity makes everything happen and that electricity doesn't need a conductor.
bill gaede
An interesting character generally likable. Fairly good at critiquing the weaknesses in traditional physics theories... But really bad at proposing a reasonable alternative. He lives by some kind of "rope Theory" that has every subatomic particle in the universe connected to every other subatomic particle in the universe by some kind of little twisting strings... Just too silly... More string than substance.
www.etherealmechanics.info
www.Distinti.com
Although well spoken and superficially reasonable the physics is all pie-in-the-sky wishing. A good experimentalist, wasting his time looking for unfound Holy Grail Magic.
Franklin Hu
A bit of an eccentric character but really quite likeable. He does a good job of outlining problems with conventional physics... But again not so good at providing an alternative. Another case of ether blindness... Where good reasoning skills are wasted trying to build reality on foundational aether.
Bob and Dave de Hilster
Say the word particle a lot which is good... but argue for faster-than-light particles, an expanding Earth, and Infinities in and out, which is very bad. More science cranks then redo it righters.
John Chappell NPS
Some kind of Club of old, really old, leftovers from the creationism Wars... Now and then they make a decent critique but mostly they just seem to be trying to replace garbage with garbage.
